Movies, Phantasy

In Time

11 July 2012

image Western democracies with the exception of the USA are remarkable in that life and death are a rather democratic affair. Especially in countries where the government runs most of the health care system (e.g. Britain, Canada, Australia) a worker may get a heart-transplant before a CEO get one. We don’t cut up workers and give his/her parts to save the life of more “important” people.  In the fictitious world of In Time every one is able to live until age 25 but then people only get to live one more year unless they obtain time from some one else. As a result the masses die on average young and the privileged can live forever, never biologically ageing more than 25 years. Will Salas’s (Justin Timberlake) mother dies early in the film because she literally runs out of time. When a privileged person with 100 years time on his account donates all his time to Salas because he is tired of living eternally, Salas drives into the region where the privileged classes live their wealthy eternal lives.

He then sets out to end this injustice where the rich steal from their poor their lifetime. While the idea of the film was interesting, the film left me with a sour taste in my mouth. The Hunger Games explored similar territory but did it with so much more artistic flair. Don’t waste time on In Time.

Author

Peter

This entry has been viewed 469 times.

Your Comments

0 Responses. Comments closed for this entry.


© 2024 Peter Murmann. Powered by ExpressionEngine.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium ExpressionEngine Themes